Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Phillips v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Sergeant Miles Perkins, Sergeant Steven Fleshman, Sergeant Nicholas Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Phillips v. Broad River Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2023cv06255
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Broad River Correctional Institution and Broad River Secure Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Phillips v. Broad River Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Perkins et al
as 1:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Sergeant Miles Perkins, Sergeant Fleshman, Associate Warden Cannings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Phillips v. Pattman et al
as 1:2019cv03533
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Brandi Lathan, Officer Cummings, Warden Micheal Stephan and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Stephon et al
as 1:2019cv02456
Defendant:
Officer Pattman and Warden Micheal Stephon
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Washington et al
as 1:2014cv02655
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Gregorey Washington, Kimberly Garvin, Tonya Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Smyre et al
as 1:2014cv00137
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Antwuan Smyre, Howard, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Scott et al
as 1:2013cv03078
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Harold Scott, Larry Cook, Travis Esterline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
