Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Whitlock v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv00639
Petitioner:
Jovan Whitlock
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradley v. Department of Corrections
as 5:2019cv02672
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
Jovan Lance Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2019cv00390
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jovan Lance Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2016cv01351
Petitioner:
Jovan Jones
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02632
Petitioner:
JOVAN WHITE
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and NANCY GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JOVAN JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS CARNEY, JOHN A. BOZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. BICKELL
as 1:2013cv00362
Petitioner:
MARVIN JOVAN JACKSON
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRATT v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2011cv06866
Plaintiff:
JOVAN PRATT
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMON v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2010cv04442
Petitioner:
JOVAN SIMON
Respondent:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
