Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Joy-El v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Kndll Joy-El
Defendant:
Unknown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carey v. Mississippi Regional Housing Authority V
as 3:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Joy Carey
Defendant:
Mississippi Regional Housing Authority V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mack v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Joy Mack
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joy v. Boulee
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Kendall Joy
Defendant:
Prison Warden Yaz Boulee
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morningstar v. HBO et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Akecheta Morningstar, PH.D.
Defendant:
HBO, Jonathon Nolan and Lisa Joy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Love v. United States Postal Services et al
as 3:2020cv00786
Defendant:
United States Postal Services, A.B. Adams, Love Joy and others
Plaintiff:
Devine Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Odom et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Odom, Sr. and Joy Odom
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Health Care, Inc. v. Harden
as 2:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
Daniel Health Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Joy Beth Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. 4.373 Acres, More or Less, Located in Hancock County, State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00551
Defendant:
Michael Carmichael, Cecilia Fowler Kennedy, Donna Carmichael and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Cocke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00174
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Joy Cocke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
