Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority v. Joyce Draganchuk, et al
as 22-1845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEWADIN CASINOS GAMING AUTHORITY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYCE DRAGANCHUK, District Judge, State of Michigan, Ingham County Circuit Court, in her Individual and Official Capacities, JLLJ DEVELOPMENT, LLC and LANSING FUTURE DEVELOPMENT II, LLC
Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority v. Draganchuk et al
as 2:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority
Defendant:
Honorable Joyce Draganchuk, JLLJ Development, LLC, Lansing Future Development II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority v. Draganchuk et al
as 2:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority
Defendant:
Honorable Joyce Draganchuk, JLLJ Development, LLC and Lansing Future Development II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority v. JLLJ Development, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority
Defendant:
JLLJ Development, LLC, Lansing Future Development II, LLC and Honorable Joyce Draganchuk
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Smith #267009 et al v. Pallas et al
as 1:2017cv00618
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009 and Heather Smith
Defendant:
D. J. Pallas, Richard Russell, Unknown Goulet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Babashola Abe v. Joyce Draganchuk, et al
as 15-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABASHOLA (SHOLA) ABE, named as 'Shola (Babashola) Abe
Defendant - Appellee:
JOYCE DRAGANCHUK, Ingham County Circuit Court Judge, Lansing Michigan, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS and MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT
Abe v. Draganchuk et al
as 1:2014cv01096
Plaintiff:
Babashola Abe
Defendant:
Joyce Draganchuk , Michigan Court of Appeals , Michigan Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Burress et al
as 2:2009cv11807
Plaintiff:
David Scott
Defendant:
Daniel Burress, Brian Lavan, James Pasenski and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
