Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Juan Arvizu-Hernandez v. Warden Ray
as 24-6155
Petitioner: JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: WARDEN RAY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arvizu-Hernandez v. Ray et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Arvizu-Hernandez
Respondent: Warden Ray and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Juan Arvizu-Hernandez v. US
as 23-6045
Petitioner / Appellant: JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU-HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ACTING WARDEN
Arvizu-Hernandez v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00179
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Arvizu-Hernandez
Respondent: United States of America and Acting Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Estrada-Hernandez v. Garland
as 22-629
Petitioner: JUAN CARLOS ESTRADA-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00436
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Juan Carlos Arvizu Hernandez v. USA
as 21-13016
Petitioner / Appellant: JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU HERNANDEZ
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arvizu Hernandez v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv21929
Plaintiff: Juan Carlos Arvizu Hernandez and Banchi
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Juan Hernandez
as 20-12610
Defendant / Appellant: JUAN CARLOS ARVIZU HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Banchi
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Toxtle, et al. v. United States Marshals Service, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00951
Defendant: Yanchhi Yam, April Aurelia Sanchez and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff: Juan Carlos Vargas Hernandez and Felix Jimenez Toxtle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?