Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Chavez v. Social Security Administration, et al.
as 24-2869
Plaintiff:
JUAN PABLO CHAVEZ
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Thankyou@SSA.gov and DOES
Chavez v. Pennington, et al.
as 24-2357
Plaintiff:
JUAN CHAVEZ, Chief Maestro Chavez and Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
JERMILL PENNINGTON, Property Manager and DOES
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Thankyou@SSA.gov et al
as 2:2024cv02234
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Thankyou@SSA.gov and Does
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chavez v. American Express Company, et al.
as 24-505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN PABLO CHAVEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, HIGH YIELD SAVINGS, CASH APP INVESTING, LLC and others
Juan Chavez v. American Express, et al
as 23-55808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN PABLO CHAVEZ, Prince of New York
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN EXPRESS, HIGH YIELD SAVINGS, CASH APP and others
Juan Pablo Chavez v. American Express et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan Chavez v. Jermill Pennington
as 22-55747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN CHAVEZ, AKA Chief Maestro Chavez, AKA Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant / Appellee:
JERMILL PENNINGTON, Property Manager
Juan Chavez v. Jermill Pennington
as 2:2022cv04763
Plaintiff:
Juan Chavez, Chief Maestro Chavez and Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Jermill Pennington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Bertelsmann SE and CO. KGaA et al
as 2:2018cv07564
Defendant:
Justin Scot, XIX Entertainment, Bertelsmann SE and Co. KGaA and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Bertelsmann SE & CO. KGaA et al
as 2:2018cv03467
Defendant:
American Idol Productions Inc, Michael Bean, Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
