Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Juan Pablo Chavez v. American Express et al
as 2:2024cv04560
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez and Prince of New York
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Communications/Switchboard Does, et al
as 2:2024cv04520
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Respondent:
Communications/Switchboard Does, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juan Pablo Chavez v. MGMT et al
as 2:2024cv04229
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
MGMT and 3rd Party Per-missions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Thankyou@SSA.gov et al
as 2:2024cv02234
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Thankyou@SSA.gov and Does
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Juan Pablo Chavez v. American Express et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan Chavez v. Jermill Pennington
as 2:2022cv04763
Plaintiff:
Juan Chavez, Chief Maestro Chavez and Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
Jermill Pennington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Bertelsmann SE and CO. KGaA et al
as 2:2018cv07564
Defendant:
Justin Scot, XIX Entertainment, Bertelsmann SE and Co. KGaA and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Bertelsmann SE & CO. KGaA et al
as 2:2018cv03467
Defendant:
American Idol Productions Inc, Michael Bean, Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA et al
as 2:2018cv02000
Defendant:
American Idol Productions Inc, Michael Bean, Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Juan Pablo Chavez v. Marko Rodin et al
as 2:2018cv01232
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
John Doe, One Lotus LLC, Marko Rodin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
