Cases 81 - 90 of 643
Jones v. Susan Camp et al
as 1:2023cv02841
Plaintiff:
Keisha Jones
Defendant:
Judge Susan Camp and Rubin Lublin, LLC
State of Georgia v. Mayes
as 1:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia, Judge Henry Thompson and Attorney Alex Oberkofler
Defendant:
Chauncey Aaron Mayes
Rhodes v. Judge Tom S. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv02680
Plaintiff:
Jon Allen Rhodes
Defendant:
US District Court Judge Tom S. Lee, Supreme Court Of Appeals, 20th District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FLORENCE v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, Mayor SKIP HENDERSON, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAVOR v. HOLT et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
KIDRON ISRAEL FLAVOR
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONNIE HOLT, SHERIFF MARKLEY, HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayward v. Peed et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Judge F. Gates Peed, Brian A. Deal and K-9 Sgt. Brian Mundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. RICHARDSON, et al.
as 4:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
HOMER DOUGLAS COBB, IV
Defendant:
Judge BEN RICHARDSON, DAVID W BUNT and MICHAEL PLEKEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
MORRIS v. RUMER
as 4:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
Judge WILLIAM C RUMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Jeorge et al
as 1:2023cv02539
Plaintiff:
Jason Harvey Miller
Defendant:
Judge Jeorge, Judge Edwards and Fani T. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv02495
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
William, Sgt. Atkins, Ct. L. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
