Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. State of North Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00211
Defendant: North Carolina State Board of Elections, Carol Hill Williams, Michael G. Dickerson and others
Plaintiff: Judicial Watch, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant: North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute and League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Lamone et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02006
Plaintiff: Judicial Watch, Inc.
Defendant: Linda H. Lamone , David J. McManus, Jr. , Patrick J. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Louis M. Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-2193
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff: CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor/Defendant: CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
US v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and KIM WESTBROOK STRACH
Intervenor/Defendant: CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
US v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and KIM WESTBROOK STRACH
Intervenor Defendant: CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae: CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, STACEY STITT, MARIA DIAZ and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: ASGOD BARRANTES, BRIAN M. MILLER, EBONY N. WEST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SARA STOHLER, KAY BRANDON, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: ASGOD BARRANTES, CHARLES M. GRAY and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Not Yet Classified: BECKY HURLEY MOCK, LOUIS M. DUKE, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Plaintiff: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, OCTAVIA RAINEY, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?