Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Dantes v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv24906
Defendant:
Honorable Stanley Marcus, Honorable Charles H. Wilson, Honorable Julie Carnes and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Dantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARNES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv07055
Plaintiff:
JULIE CARNES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodson v. Strozier et al
as 1:2017cv22110
Defendant:
Marc W. Morris, Micheal J. Strozier, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Damarcus Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hives v. Carnes et al
as 8:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Taajwarr O. Hives
Defendant:
Julie Carnes, Justice Wilson, Justice Merryday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Betts et al
as 1:2012cv03811
Plaintiff:
Tobias A. Thomas
Defendant:
Danielle Betts, Johnathan Kluse, Courtyard Marriott and others
William Windsor v. B. Grutby, et al
as 12-10157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
B. GRUTBY, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., Judge, ORINDA D. EVANS, Judge and others
William Windsor v. Thomas Thrash, et al
as 12-10095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS W. THRASH, CHRISTOPHER J. HUBER, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. and others
William Windsor v. Thomas Thrash, et al
as 11-15276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS W. THRASH, CHRISTOPHER J. HUBER, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. and others
William Windsor v. B. Grutby, et al
as 11-15275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
B. GRUTBY, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., ORINDA D. EVANS and others
:
SERVICE
William Windsor v. B. Grutby, et al
as 11-14847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
B. GRUTBY, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., ORINDA D. EVANS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
