Cases
MURRAY v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv01561
Plaintiff: MARTIN JULIUS MURRAY
Defendant: UNITED STATES NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Murray v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv03102
Defendant: 3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: Julius Murray, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MURRAY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2022cv02593
Plaintiff: MARTIN JULIUS MURRAY
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Able et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv01287
Defendant: 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff: Luke Able, Gilbert Ackerson, Destiny Alger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Able et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv02872
Plaintiff: Luke Able, Gilbert Ackerson, Destiny Alger and others
Defendant: 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
WASHINGTON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv04634
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ("DHS") OF PHILA., MULTI-ETHNIC BEHAVORIAL HEALTH INC. and others
Plaintiff: TROY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
THE ESTATE OF DANIEAL KELLY v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv03700
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF DANIEAL KELLY and THE ESTATE OF DANIEAL KELLY
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ("DHS") OF THE CITY OF PHILA., MULTI-ETHNIC BEHAVORIAL HEALTH INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?