Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Byrd v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2012cv02377
Plaintiff:
June Byrd
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott Andochick v. Ronald Byrd
as 12-1728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT ANDOCHICK, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD BYRD, Individually, JUNE BYRD, Individually and RONALD AND JUNE BYRD, As Co-Admininstrators of the Estate of Erika L. Byrd
Principal Life Insurance Company v. Andochick et al
as 1:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Scott E. Andochick, Ronald Byrd and June Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Scott Andochick v. Ronald Byrd
as 11-2303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT ANDOCHICK
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD BYRD, Individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Erika L. Byrd and JUNE BYRD, Individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Erika L. Byrd
Thomas et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv02695
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas , Jeremy White , Joseph Mueller and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00792
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas, Jeremy White, Joseph Mueller and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Andochick v. Ronald And June Byrd, As Co-Administrators Of The Estate Of Erika L. Byrd et al
as 1:2011cv00739
Plaintiff:
Scott Andochick
Defendant:
Ronald And June Byrd, As Co-Administrators Of The Estate Of Erika L. Byrd , Ronald Byrd and June Byrd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
