Cases 31 - 40 of 191
JUSINO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17864
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JUSINO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. Jusino
as 5:2022cv05220
Petitioner:
Lois Latrilla Phillips
Respondent:
Warden T. Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv05082
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Erica Strong, Warden T. Jusino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martensen v. Jusino
as 3:2022cv04952
Petitioner:
Helene M. Martensen, Helene M. Cartier and Helene M. Johnson
Respondent:
T. Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JUSINO MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15018
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO JUSINO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fleming v. Jusino
as 4:2022cv02521
Petitioner:
Rhonda Fleming
Respondent:
Warden Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shaundelle Dial v. Von Blanckensee, et al
as 22-16053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAUNDELLE DIAL
Defendant / Appellee:
VON B. BLANCKENSEE, Complex USP Warden at FCC USP Tucson, JACKSON, Unknown; Administrative Remedy Coordinator, Executive Assistant, FCC, USP Tucson, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Associate Warden, Programs and others
Fleming v. Jusino
as 5:2022cv04195
Petitioner:
Rhonda Fleming
Defendant:
Warden Jusino @ FCI Dublin
Respondent:
Warden Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Chandar Snow v. Jusino
as 22-55630
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHANDAR A. SNOW, also known as Shawn Snow
Respondent / Appellee:
JUSINO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
