Cases 1 - 10 of 26
DOUGLAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26482
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MATHERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv14743
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS MATHERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLSUP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16862
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS ALLSUP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09895
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
O'Bryant v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01856
Plaintiff:
Justin Douglas O'Bryant
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company and Phillip Morris USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53694
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33901
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS BARNARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Justin Jones
as 21-35143
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Campbell v. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv02277
Defendant:
Joe Faliszek, Vangela Thompson, Louie Gallo and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Douglas Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00424
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Steven Justin Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
