Cases 41 - 50 of 764
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2014cv00961
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Jones
as 4:2014cv00452
Petitioner:
Terry Lamar Green
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berryhill v. LaGrange, et al
as 14-6156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
VICKI MILES LAGRANGE, U.S. District Judge, LEE R. WEST, District Director, U.S. District Judge, ROBIN CAUTHRON, District Director, U.S. District Judge and others
Berryhill v. OK DOC Board Members, et al
as 14-6155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS, DIRECTOR OF DENTISTRY, MARTY SIRMONS, Warden and others
Thomas v. Jones et al
as 5:2014cv00712
Petitioner:
Rashad Amin Thomas
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berryhill v. United States, et al
as 14-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Camren v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dennis K Camren
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma , Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Ottawa County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cleveland v. Martin, et al
as 14-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CLEVELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY MARTIN, Warden, MAURICE WARRIOR, Deputy Warden, GLENN WALDON, Unit Manager and others
Williams v. Jones, et al
as 14-7038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, TIM WILKINSON, Warden and BRIAN WIDEMAN, Chaplain
Jordanoff v. Jones
as 5:2014cv00493
Petitioner:
James Jordanoff
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
