Cases 1 - 10 of 28,932
Sanford et al v. Morris et al
as 6:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
David Sanford, Drew Sanford, Revocable Trust Agreement of David K. Sanford and others
Defendant:
Jim Morris, Paul Freeman, TRock Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Nineteenseventynine LLC et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Nineteenseventynine LLC doing business as Breakfast Joynt, The and Sublime Surprise LLC doing business as Hot Java
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
US v. Ronald Jenkins, Jr.
as 24-4220
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RONALD DAMONE JENKINS, JR., a/k/a G, a/k/a GG, a/k/a Gee, a/k/a Gee Gee
US v. Japree Brooks
as 24-4221
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAPREE LORTEZ BROOKS, a/k/a Choppa, a/k/a Khoppa, a/k/a Primo
US v. Thomas Palmer
as 24-4222
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS WELDON PALMER, a/k/a Flame, a/k/a Jynx, a/k/a Jynx Da Don
US v. Jamique Mays
as 24-4223
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMIQUE MAYS, a/k/a Eye Tunes
Barajas Galvan, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2632
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO JAVIER BARAJAS GALVAN and YESENIA ALCALA VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Leyva Morales, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2634
Plaintiff:
ALMA EDITH LEYVA MORALES and TIMOTEO MORALES ROMAN
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Diaz-Godinez, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2641
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DIAZ-GODINEZ and RITA GODINEZ ALVAREZ
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Brito, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2637
Plaintiff:
LIZBETH BRITO and HILARIO CAMPUZANO PRESTEGUI
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
