Cases 1 - 10 of 1,200
Kevin K. Williams v. Brian Lammer
as 24-1781
Plaintiff:
KEVIN K. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVEY v. JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JERRY DAVEY, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEAVELL, K. KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Mucha, et al v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 24-1720
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MUCHA, Shareholder of Buzz Energies Inc and DIANE K. MUELLER
Appellant:
JAMES D. LAMMERS, also known as JAMES D. KURTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, SHEBOYGAN COUNTY, WISCONSIN, RACINE COUNTY, WISCONSIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
White, Nathan v. Moran, Michael et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Nathan Alexander White
Defendant:
Michael K. Moran and Amanda J. Ley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICE v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RICE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, K. DANIELS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
