Cases 11 - 20 of 932
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Kristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawatske, Allyson v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Allyson K Sawatske and Allyson K. Sawatske
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Davenport v. Klang et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Rodney Klang, Rebecca Tervonen, Sgt Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchins, Heather v. Hurt, Brian et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Heather Hutchins
Defendant:
Brian K. Hurt and City of Cornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ledbetter v. Indivior Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Ledbetter and Michael P Ledbetter
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McMath v. Kinnard et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert C McMath
Defendant:
Capt Scott C Kinnard, Sgt Julico De Lima Silva and K McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabagua v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Cabagua
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, Kevin Carr, J Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borowski v. Williams
as 2:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
John K Borowski, Jr
Defendant:
Sandy A Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01743
Petitioner:
Jeffrey K Walker
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
