Cases 1 - 10 of 11,410
Lazaran et al
as 2:2024cv03513
Petitioner:
Mary A Lazaran, Atty Nathaniel K MacPherson and Ann Bell Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Freilich et al
as 2:2024cv03514
Petitioner:
Amy Freilich, Neil Popowitz and Atty Nathaniel K MacPherson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roldan v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity et al
as 2:2024cv03483
Plaintiff:
Jhonny Roldan
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, a public entity, 168 Realty Inc., Tony Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roldan v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2024cv03485
Plaintiff:
Jhonny Roldan
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 168 Realty Inc., Tony Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deborah K. Wong v. Cosmetic Town Inc
as 2:2024cv03442
Plaintiff:
Deborah K. Wong
Defendant:
Cosmetic Town Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
(PC) Dicks v. Moseley et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Eric Dicks
Defendant:
H. Moseley, S. Gates, Melinda Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Alameda County Santa Rita Jail et al
as 1:2024cv02514
Plaintiff:
Jacobi Gaines
Defendant:
Alameda County Santa Rita Jail, K. De La Fuente and Karl Greigore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Khonamany v. Painter
as 2:2024cv01189
Petitioner:
Vilaychith Khonamany
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luong v. Liang et al
as 5:2024cv02440
Plaintiff:
Bob K Luong
Defendant:
Charles Liang and Super Micro Computer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NVE Experience Agency, LLC et al v. Pension Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv03395
Plaintiff:
NVE Experience Agency, LLC and Brett Hyman
Defendant:
Pension Systems Corporation doing business as 401(K) Easy and James Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
