Cases 41 - 50 of 570
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0276 Davis-Bacon Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PASCAL et al v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 2:2022cv01726
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. PASCAL, STEPHANIE MCFADDEN and JAMES WRAY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DONALD K. MYERS, JASON RENSHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
