Cases 21 - 30 of 85
McNeely v. Leigh et al
as 5:2018cv00187
Defendant:
RewardZone USA LLC, Matt McConlin, Barbara Underwood and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa McNeely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloodman v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct et al
as 4:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Teresa Bloodman
Defendant:
Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct , Robert Stark Ligon , James Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffen v. Arkansas Supreme Court et al
as 4:2017cv00639
Plaintiff:
Wendell Griffen
Defendant:
Arkansas Supreme Court, John Dan Kemp, Robin F Wynne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Farmer v. Duncan et al
as 5:2017cv05171
Plaintiff:
Billy K. Farmer
Defendant:
Xollie Duncan, Buffie Merryman, Jennifer DuCharme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Daniels v. Metropolitan Housing Alliance et al
as 4:2017cv00528
Plaintiff:
Byron K Daniels
Defendant:
Metropolitan Housing Alliance, Dana Arnette, Monteque Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Daniels v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 4:2016cv00749
Defendant:
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Metropolitan Housing Alliance , Robyn Hornes and others
Plaintiff:
Byron K Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brann v. Garland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2016cv06075
Plaintiff:
Travis Brann
Defendant:
Garland County Sheriff's Department , Lane Mayo , Charles Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
