Cases 41 - 50 of 2,440
Hester-Spann v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton, Carren Franke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CHARLES COOK, JR.
Defendant:
MERSHON, M. KNIESER, S. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Moffett v. Michael Dittman, et al
as 24-1023
Plaintiff:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. DITTMAN, SECURITY DIRECTOR WEBBER, MICHAEL BUETTNER and others
McMath v. Kinnard et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert C McMath
Defendant:
Capt Scott C Kinnard, Sgt Julico De Lima Silva and K McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabagua v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Cabagua
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, Kevin Carr, J Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffie v. Bakowski et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Cornelious W Duffie
Defendant:
Bakowski, K Harris, J Sonny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Don'Virgil Winston
Defendant:
Scott Spurlock, Misty Adkins, Zachery Schelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffie v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Cornelious W Duffie
Defendant:
Hernandez, K Sudduth, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01743
Petitioner:
Jeffrey K Walker
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
