Cases 41 - 50 of 404
RICE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, JOHN DOE #2, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERIS v. SOUTHERN
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
LARRY MERIS
Defendant:
J.P. SOUTHERN, CUPID, K. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Hoover et al
as 5:2021ct03384
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Defendant:
Sgt. K. Hoover, Warden Jackson and Officer Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEBANE v. EDEN POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv00850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
EDEN POLICE, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFC. J. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. BOGER et al
as 1:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
GERMINIQUE S. ROSS
Defendant:
J. C. BOGER, J. H. PRISK, Z. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. SHEEN et al
as 1:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
CLERK LYNDA SHEEN, REGISTER OF DEEDS ANN SHAW, SHERIFF LITCHARD HURLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritter v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2021ct03288
Plaintiff:
David Alan Ritter
Defendant:
Lieutenant Bryan K. Wheeler, Officer Kinner and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. McDowell County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Martin Ray Robinson, James Julius Lumpkin, David Kenneth Fowler and others
Defendant:
McDowell County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
