Cases 51 - 60 of 5,183
Daley v. The Schepens Eye Research Institute
as 24-1130
Plaintiff:
NANCY DALEY
Defendant:
MIRA, INC., SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, f/k/a Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation and THE SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, f/k/a Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation
Groden v. NASDI, LLC
as 24-1107
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F. GRODEN, Executive Director of the New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund
Defendant:
NASDI, LLC, f/k/a North American Site Developers, Inc.
US v. Serrano
as 24-1096
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE E. SERRANO, a/k/a Condor, a/k/a Indio, a/k/a Indiana
US v. Hernandez-Negron
as 24-1081
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR HERNANDEZ-NEGRON, a/k/a Tito Quiju
Interested Party:
STEERING COMMITTEE and PEDRO R. PIERLUISI
US v. Garcia-Sierra
as 24-1085
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ADOLFO LEON GARCIA-SIERRA, a/k/a Fito
Patel v. The United States et al
as 1:2024cv10180
Plaintiff:
The Excellent Raj K Patel
Defendant:
The United States, The Harvard Corporation, Harvard University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kifor v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1075
Plaintiff:
IMRE KIFOR
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, MIDDLESEX PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT and others
Smith v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10176
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Lee and Robert K. Smith
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Vose v. Kilmartin, et al
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
CARLTON VOSE
Defendant:
PETER F. KILMARTIN, GERALD J. COYNE, PATRICIA K. ROCHA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
