Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Perales Jr. v. Nababi et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Rene Perales Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Nababi, Kelly Johnson, K. Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TLUSTY v. SWAIN et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TLUSTY and ROBERT J TLUSTY
Defendant:
D SWAIN, K DAVIS, J ELLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Russell, et al
as 3:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Benton
Defendant:
Tracy Ann Russell, David Stephens and William K. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benton v. Fahlgren et al
as 3:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Benton
Defendant:
S. Fahlgren, Circuit Court of 4th Judicial Circuit for Duval County, Florida, William K. Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv15820
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K. DAVIS II and WILLIAM K DAVIS, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KLAPP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13162
Plaintiff:
ADAM KLAPP, CHARLES KINNARD, DARRIUS PEARSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TERRANOVA v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04685
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND TERRANOVA, ERIC KING, WILLIE COLE WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20582
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER K. DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Wappler v. Wayne Ivey, et al
as 22-13418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. WAPPLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE IVEY, MICHAEL HATTON, BISBEE and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
