Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Smith v. Hill et al
as 3:2013cv02475
Petitioner:
Richard Edward Smith
Respondent:
Victor K. Hill , Harold R. Banke Justice Center and Clayton County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horstman v. Tate et al
as 3:2013cv04561
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul Horstman
Defendant:
Harold Tate, K. Hill, Amber Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05464
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronnie Brandafino v. Hydro-Aire Inc et al
as 2:2013cv03002
Defendant:
Bell Aerospace Services Inc, Bell Helicopter Textron Inc, Crane Aerospace Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Brandafino
Alicia D Faircloth et al v. Hydro-Aire Inc et al
as 2:2013cv03001
Defendant:
Bell Aerospace Services Inc, Bell Helicopter Textron Inc, Crane Aerospace Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia D Faircloth, Beverly Faircloth and Dean Faircloth
Stewart Manago v. K. Holland, et al
as 12-16632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEWART MANAGO
Defendant - Appellee:
K. HOLLAND, Chief Deputy Warden, K. L. LARGE, Correctional Lieutenant, W. CRIBB, Transportation Sergeant and others
Garcia v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Garcia
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, M. Cate, L. D. Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manago v. Holland et al
as 1:2011cv02033
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
K. Holland, D. Zanchi, K.L. Large and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G. Alexander Hill et al v. National Association of Flight Instructors Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06851
Plaintiff:
G. Alexander Hill, G. Alexander Hill, Jo Ann K. Hill and others
Defendant:
National Association of Flight Instructors Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
