Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Faith Wilson et al v. City of Pomona et al
as 2:2024cv02605
Plaintiff:
Faith Wilson and Minor K. W.
Defendant:
City of Pomona, Pomona Police Department, Pomona Police Office A. Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(SS) K.W v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
K. W.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
K. W.1 et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
K. W.1 and K. W.2
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Kaila Paul, Juan Cevallos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) State of California v. K.W. et al
as 2:2021cv00806
Defendant:
Jennette-Hardin Waldow and K. W.
Plaintiff:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
K.W. v. The Regents of the University of California et al
as 3:2021cv01105
Plaintiff:
K. W.
Defendant:
The Regents of the University of California and Robert Kevess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Marvin Braselman v. K W Prunty, et al
as 5:2000cv00307
Petitioner:
Marvin Gaye Braselman
Unknown:
Monica Knox, Case Assignment Administrator, Dep In Chg E Div and others
Respondent:
California State Attorney General and K W Prunty
Defendant:
J NMI Gomez and Warden Larry Small
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07719
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Evans v. Garrison et al
as 1:2013cv01963
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evans
Defendant:
Alvis Garrison, Sierra, Cantu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Emerson, et al.
as 1:2012cv01827
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Rogers
Defendant:
N Emerson , K W Goss and M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
