Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Royal v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Royal
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC, Rajvinder Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Superville Jr. v. Irving et al
as 1:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Dexter E Superville Jr.
Defendant:
Antionette V. Irving, Twitty, Gangwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Taylor v. Kamal
as 3:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
Christian Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Sinan Kamal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Kamal et al
as 7:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Christian Taylor
Defendant:
Sinan Kamal, B. Wedding and James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Idrissi v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2021cv00541
Petitioner:
Kamal El Idrissi
Respondent:
Attorney General, Security of the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Ice Field Office Director for the Eastern District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arooj v. Westneck Handyman, LLC
as 1:2020cv01000
Defendant:
Westneck Handyman, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kamal Arooj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01497
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Qazah v. USA
as 2:2019cv81393
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kamal Qazah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Liberato et al v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Stephen Herrick, Fereidoun Behi, Nurse Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Ariel Liberato and Geneva Rathbone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
