Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Aina v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2021cv00794
Defendant:
Trooper Luke Straniere, C.O. Baughman, Jason A. Lambrino and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Yanick Aina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kane et al v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2019cv01544
Defendant:
Dauphin County Board of Prison Inspectors, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., John Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Kane, Estate of Sarah Elizabeth Quinn and Michael E. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD v. MANGOLD et al
as 2:2019cv00504
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER GREGORY GILLESPIE, KATHLEEN KANE, SPECIAL AGENT PATRICK MANGOLD and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Kane et al
as 1:2018cv00661
Plaintiff:
Gail J. Galloway
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane, PA Office of the Attorney General, Huntingdon County Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Runge v. Freedman et al
as 3:2018cv00451
Plaintiff:
Charles V. Runge
Defendant:
Marvin Freedman, Robert Conway, Kathleen Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parno v. Kane et al
as 1:2016cv01949
Plaintiff:
Glenn A. Parno
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane, Renee Martin, David Peifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carusone v. Kane et al
as 1:2016cv01944
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carusone
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane, Renee Martin, David Peifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. KING et al
as 2:2016cv01001
Plaintiff:
CARLOS WHITE
Defendant:
ADRIAN KING, DAVID TYLER, DANIELLE OSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONTGOMERY v. IZZULINO et al
as 2:2016cv00789
Plaintiff:
PRICE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
ROBERT IZZULINO, JUSTIN CODA, MIKE MOLITARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
