Disability Insurance Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Theodore McElhone v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 14-16129
Plaintiff - Appellant: THEODORE MCELHONE
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services
Ratcliff v. Lighty
as 14-2010
Plaintiff - Appellant: Elijah W. Ratcliff, Agent
Defendant - Appellee: Donald Lighty, State Bar of Texas, Polk County, Texas and others
Ratcliff et al v. Lighty et al
as 1:2014cv03680
Plaintiff: Elijah W. Ratcliff
Defendant: Donald Lighty, Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, State Bar of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOFFA v. SEBELIUS
as 5:2013cv06424
Plaintiff: TANYA D. HOFFA
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DECRISCIO v. SEBELIUS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv06672
Plaintiff: JENNIFER DECRISCIO
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOLLOMAN v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv03804
Plaintiff: ANTOWON HOLLOMAN
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
YOUNKERS v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2013cv02809
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE J. YOUNKERS
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Maslanik v. Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00825
Plaintiff: Julia Anne Maslanik
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Interested_party: SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McElhone v. Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv06090
Plaintiff: Theodore Patrick McElhone
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LYNN v. SEBELIUS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01200
Plaintiff: JANET G. LYNN
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?