Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Kathy Reaves v. The Wilcox Law Firm
as 22-1624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHY REAVES
Defendant / Appellee:
THE WILCOX LAW FIRM, JEROME SCOTT KOZACKI, MARK KEEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1482
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reaves v. IDENTEGO/IDEMIA et al
as 3:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
IDENTEGO/IDEMIA and South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Reaves v. South Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2022cv01323
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Public Safety, South Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles and South Carolina Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Wilkerson et al
as 4:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Scott Wilkerson, Regina Crolley, Mark Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Keel et al
as 4:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Mark Keel, Henry McMaster and Christopher A. Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Reaves v. The Wilcox Law Firm et al
as 4:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
The Wilcox Law Firm, J. Scott Kozacki, Mark Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Crews
as 4:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Kathryn M. Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
