Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Keel v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05055
Plaintiff:
Melissa D Keel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fleming v. Foley et al
as 1:2020cv00916
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fleming
Defendant:
Attorney Michael Trapp, Judge Patrick J. Foley, Prosecutor James keeling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Jeff Keel
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01765
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tum-Re El v. Van Saun et al
as 3:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
Montu Hotep Tum-Re El
Defendant:
Bruce Van Saun, Brian E. Smith and Matthew Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tum-Re El v. Van Saun et al
as 3:2015cv01248
Plaintiff:
Montu Hotep Tum-Re El
Defendant:
Bruce Van Saun , Brian E. Smith and Matthew Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chapman v. Lawson et al
as 1:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Steven Lawson, Agents of Regional Narcotics Unit and Organized Crime Divison, Mark Tiereny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel v. Medco Health Solutions Medical Plan et al
as 2:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Maria Keel
Defendant:
Medco Health Solutions Medical Plan, Medco Health Solutions Inc and United Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Keeling v. Darnell et al
as 5:2012cv03015
Plaintiff:
Dustin Keeling
Defendant:
James Darnell , Bobby Tucker, Jr. , William Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Keels v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al.
as 1:2012dp22185
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harriet Keels
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
