Cases 131 - 140 of 368
CLINTON v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv00545
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
KILEY CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Dickenson v. Keith Butt
as 17-1324
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DICKENSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS
MOSEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv00402
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
NOAH MOSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VOLAND v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2017cv00390
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CORP. and BRUCE LEMMON
Plaintiff:
JERRY VOLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANKINS v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv00360
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIRIG v. GEO/NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00229
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, GEO/NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and J. SHAW
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2017cv00092
Defendant:
S. BECKER, ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIRIG v. GEO/NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, JANE DOE(S), JOHN DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKINGBOTTOM v. BUTTS, ET AL
as 1:2016cv03423
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., HIPPEL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE HICKINGBOTTOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMPLE v GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03412
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, MS. FRENCH, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS F SAMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
