Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 368
Roderick Bunnell v. Keith Butts
as 16-4149
Petitioner - Appellant: RODERICK BUNNELL
Respondent - Appellee: KEITH BUTTS
Sample v GEO Group Inc The et al
as 2:2016cv00515
Plaintiff: Curtis F Sample, Jr.
Defendant: Geo Group Inc The, New Castle Correctional Facility, Keith Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANLEY v. BUTTS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03292
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RILEY et al v. BUTTS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03243
Defendant: ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS, ADAM DEMING and others
Plaintiff: CLINTON RILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODRING v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv03222
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: BRIAN WOODRING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAILEY v. BUTTS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02625
Petitioner: LUCAS BAILEY
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANLEY v. BUTTS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02586
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DRUMMOND v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv02489
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: DAVID DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALKER v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv02490
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: CHARLES WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VALDEZ v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2016cv02444
Defendant: KEITH BUTTS and JENNINGS
Plaintiff: SANTIAGO VALDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?