Cases 1 - 10 of 25
CLARK v. PLATT et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. CLARK, II
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, KEITH HARTZELL, PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Pannell v. Sarah Eads, et al
as 23-2990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH EADS, KEITH HARTZELL, ROBERT CARTER and others
David Pannell v. Sarah Eads, et al
as 23-2972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH EADS, KEITH HARTZELL, ROBERT CARTER and others
RAMSEY v. HARTZEL et al
as 1:2023cv01782
Plaintiff:
FAIRLIS G. RAMSEY
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZEL, CHRIS PLATT and SERVIZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01745
Plaintiff:
MONWELL DOUGLAS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. PRETORIUS, CHAD PLATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. PRETORIOUS et al
as 1:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ
Defendant:
PATRICIA PRETORIOUS, CHAD PLATT and KEITH HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUSTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. HUSTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. PRETORIUS, CHAD PLATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KYLE v. INDIANA I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
ERIC CHARLES KYLE
Defendant:
INDIANA I.D.O.C., PLAINFIELD CORR FCLY, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
KEITH ELLIS
Defendant:
M. ROBERTS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, T. PICTOUROUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
