Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hall v. Kenney et al
as 2:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hall
Defendant:
Demetrius Antoine Kenney, Joseph E Walden, Jeffrey Brumlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddis v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Kelley Johnson and Donnie Landers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin-Byrd v. Haney et al
as 4:2022cv01326
Plaintiff:
London Griffin-Byrd
Defendant:
Elizabeth P Haney, Kaye Farley, Bri Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Chames et al
as 1:2021cv00769
Plaintiff:
Toni Jones
Defendant:
Butterworth, Shelia Fields, Chames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TD Development, LLC v. City of Auburn, Alabama et al
as 3:2021cv00296
Defendant:
Steven Dixon, Connie Fitch, Jay Hovey and others
Plaintiff:
TD Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pilcher v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Gary Malone, William Curtis Streeter, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
J Thomas Pilcher, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley et al v. Harrison et al
as 1:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Janet May and Randy Kelley
Defendant:
Christopher England, Democratic Party of the United States of America, State Democratic Executive Committee of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Shikle v. Cullman County, Alabama et al
as 5:2020cv01442
Defendant:
Samantha Stout, Kaitlyn Thomas, June Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Robin Shikle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
