Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kelley v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Frank D. Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Fite et al
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmaunel Benjoassaint, Wislene Casir and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth L. Fite, Sarah B. Akins, Hon. J. Antonio DelCampo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garvin v. TransAm Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gregory Garvin
Defendant:
TransAm Trucking, Inc., Marlon Kelley, Carolina Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Doyle v. Pooler Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00267
Plaintiff:
John A. Doyle
Defendant:
Pooler Police Department, Pat Doherty, Amanda Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. United States Of America
as 6:2021cv00027
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Lee Syntell Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Doyle v. Kelley et al
as 4:2020cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Doyle
Defendant:
Amanda Kelley, Patrick Doherty and Corey Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atum-Rayay v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2019cv00309
Defendant:
Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Joe Roesch, Tammie Mosley and others
Plaintiff:
RaHarrakte Sahu Atum-Rayay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
