Cases 11 - 20 of 215
Kelley v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Frank D. Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC v. THE SEVEN SIX LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC
Defendant:
THE SEVEN SIX LLC and CHASE KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Miller et al v. E. Amanda Dellinger, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
Abigail Miller, Ashley Cincinatus, Kelley Staley and others
Defendant:
E. Amanda Dellinger, LLC doing business as Thrive Counseling, E. Amanda Dellinger-Allen and Greg Allen
Damon v. Simpson et al
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Damon Damon
Defendant:
John T. Simpson, E. Kelley Owens, Donna P. Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
