Cases 41 - 50 of 2,146
Mendoza v. Martinez
as 3:2023cv01544
Petitioner:
Tony Mendoza
Respondent:
Kelly Martinez and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bologna #054707 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bologna
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. County of San Diego Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01396
Petitioner:
Chad Arnold
Respondent:
County of San Diego Corporation, San Diego County Board of Supervisors, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Rice et al
as 4:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Mark W Kelly
Defendant:
Travis J Rice, Vincent A Duarte, Jason R Ponza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddie Evans v. Kelly Santoro
as 23-55630
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDDIE LEE EVANS
Respondent / Appellee:
KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden
Erick Silva-Suarez v. Kelly Santoro
as 23-55627
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERICK SILVA-SUAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden
(PC) Kelly v. Cross et al
as 2:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
R Cross, Jiun Ma, Haing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08357
Plaintiff:
Kelly L Jones
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keenan Wilkins v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, TIMOTHY M. LOCKWOOD and others
Kelly v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Crystal Lynn Kelly
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
