Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Oladokun v. Kelly
as 5:2024ct03091
Plaintiff:
Oladayo Oladokun
Defendant:
Warden L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kelly v. American Bar Association
as 5:2024ct03047
Plaintiff:
Steven Kelly and Steven James Kelly
Defendant:
American Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ANDREWS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFF SESSIONS, RIPLEY RAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Kelly
as 5:2022ct03459
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kunlay Williams
Defendant:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SANDERS v. TOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
LEVAN LAFORREST SANDERS
Defendant:
KELLY TOMPSON, AVERY MICHELLE CRUMP and EDWARD BRUSCNO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv00954
Plaintiff:
LEVAN SANDERS
Defendant:
ASST. D.A. KELLY THOMPSON and EDWARD BRUNSCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. KYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
LEVAN LAFORREST SANDERS
Defendant:
KELLY KYLE and HOMICIDE DET. BRUSCNO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seleznev v. Leu
as 5:2022ct03139
Plaintiff:
Roman Seleznev
Defendant:
Warden Leu, R. Wright, L. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. WELCH et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
SARA Q. LOBNER, KELLY WELCH, WILLIAM L. OSTEAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
