Cases 31 - 40 of 771
Monroe v. Transamerica Equipment Company
as 2:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
James Kelly Monroe
Defendant:
Transamerica Equipment Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Transamerica Equipment Company
as 1:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
James Kelly Monroe
Defendant:
Transamerica Equipment Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smithart et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
L.B. Smithart, Ben C. Reeves, Rebecca G. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2023cv23986
Plaintiff:
PERCY L HALL
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, CLARK, HINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2023cv01649
Petitioner:
Ricky Kelly
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plummer v. Sampson
as 2:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Kelly Plummer
Respondent:
Warden Gregory Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee Kelly v. USA
as 23-12436
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEE SYNTELL KELLY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THOMPSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, JASON BRENES-CATINCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. KELLY et al
as 4:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
DAVHON YOUNG
Defendant:
ROBERT KELLY and TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serrano v. Okeechobee County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv14198
Plaintiff:
Moses Serrano, Jr.
Defendant:
Okeechobee County Jail, Corporal Sanchez, Sgt Morrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
