Cases 41 - 50 of 156
Randle v. City of Fort Wayne, Indiana et al
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Payne Thomas Randle and Payne T Randle
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne, Indiana, Daniel Radecki, Bryan Heine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
DANTREZ JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, SCOTT MELLINGER, TYLER JUGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Vantuinen et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Eberaia D Fields
Defendant:
Alec S Vantuinen, Coleman Beckley and Kelly Wireman
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. MEDICAL STAFF et al
as 1:2021cv02706
Plaintiff:
JACOB CODY BRIER
Defendant:
MEDICAL STAFF and KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finnegan v. Foerg et al
as 3:2021cv00783
Defendant:
Jeffery K Richwine, Dale J Starkes, Phillip Foerg and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
VINAY GRANT
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, FRANK LOOP, DAVID FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STILLWELL v. DWENGER et al
as 1:2021cv01452
Defendant:
DEANNA DWENGER and KRISTEN DAUSS
Plaintiff:
KELLY STILLWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. VANSCHOYCK et al
as 2:2021cv00230
Defendant:
KELLY INDA, SHAKEFER, BENNETH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01404
Petitioner:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Respondent:
DR. JACKIE WEST-DENNING, KIM HOBSON, DR. NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jordan et al
as 3:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Johnson
Defendant:
Shamika Jordan and Samantha Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
