Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Kenneth L. Cameron v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00042
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Cameron
BURNO v. WOJUOLA et al
as 3:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BURNO
Defendant:
MOBOLAJI WOJUOLA, C. TIM MILLER, DAVID J. CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLETCHER v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2016cv01592
Petitioner:
EDWARD FLETCHER
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, R. SETH WILLIAMS and C. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LONGENDORFER v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2016cv00802
Petitioner:
JOHN E. LONGENDORFER
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRACHT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALBERT PRACHT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, KENNETH R. CAMERON, MR. MUBALAJ WUJUOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth L Cameron v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2015cv01660
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Cameron
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FRANCIS v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2015cv00181
Petitioner:
OMAR FRANCIS
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, JOHN WETZEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CURRIN v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2014cv01523
Petitioner:
JOHN PAUL CURRIN
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FERGUSON v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2014cv03257
Petitioner:
ARTHUR M. FERGUSON
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DELAWARE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERS v. CAMERON
as 3:2013cv00052
Petitioner:
SHARIK L. PETERS
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
