Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 461
Singh v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv05267
Plaintiff: Ashok Singh
Defendant: Merrick B Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00755
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc., et al v. USDHS, et al
as 22-16552
Plaintiff / Appellee: GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS & INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., TOPPER BROKERAGE, INC., LEXINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, Under the title of Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Angelica Clark, et al v. Gabriel Russell, et al
as 22-35276
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Defendant / Appellee: GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES, RUSSELL E. BURGER and others
Defendant: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03051
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35248
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15154
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vinay Yerrapareddypeddireddy, et al v. Matthew Albence, et al
as 21-17070
Plaintiff / Appellant: VINAY YERRAPAREDDYPEDDIREDDY and ANUSHA RATIKRINDI
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?