Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JACKSON, JR. v. GIBBS et al
as 3:2024cv01141
Plaintiff:
KEVINE JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
DWAYNE GIBBS and PENSKE LEASING AND RENTAL CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2023cv23183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, ALISHA LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON, ANTHONY CASALE, DANO TOKLEY and others
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY, MARCUS O. HICKS, VICTORIA L. KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv07651
Defendant:
JOHN DOE & JANE DOE, DONALD J. TRUMP and WILLIAM BARR
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MODELL'S SPORTING GOODS, INC.
as 2:2017cv09445
Defendant:
MODELL'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. , SIMON PROPERTY GROUP , JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Cross_claimant:
MODELL'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP
Cross_defendant:
KEVIN JACKSON, SIMON PROPERTY GROUP , JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2017cv00972
Petitioner:
KEVIN JACKSON
Respondent:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, GARY M. LANIGAN, WILLIE BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06386
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016cv03089
Petitioner:
KEVINE JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
