Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HARDY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02826
Not Classified By Court:
ANTHONY HARDY, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and KATHLEEN JO LANDERKIN
Defendant:
KIMBERLY GROOMS and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PURCELL et al v. HENNIG et al
as 2:2022cv00469
Defendant:
HENNIG KRAMER RUIZ & SINGH P.C., ROB HENNIG and HENNIG RUIZ P.C.
Plaintiff:
CHRIS PURCELL and KIMBERLY GROOME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 2:2021mc00026
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GROOME, CHRIS PURCELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Purcell et al v. Blust
as 2:2021mc00022
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GROOME, CHRIS PURCELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Linda Blust
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 2:2021mc00020
Respondent:
Jamie Kramar McPherson
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GROOME, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CHRIS PURCELL and others
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
United States of America et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 2:2021mc00019
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GROOME, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CHRIS PURCELL and others
Respondent:
Marc Aquino
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 2:2021mc00016
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GROOME, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL and CHRIS PURCELL
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
United States of America v. Gilead Sciences Inc
as 2:2021mc00015
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GROOME and CHRIS PURCELL
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021mc00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
