Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 208
McCrae v. King
as 5:2023ct03082
Plaintiff: Samuel McCrae, III
Defendant: Paula Lichelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez-Rocha v. King
as 5:2023hc02026
Petitioner: Jose Gomez-Rocha
Respondent: Malinda L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WIGGINS v. TRAGESER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00947
Plaintiff: ALLEN KING WIGGINS
Defendant: MARCELLA (MARCY) TRAGESER, JAMIE KIRKMAN and JESSICA NORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00929
Plaintiff: ANDREW M. KING
Defendant: TERRY JOHNSON, RAHEEM ALEEM, OFFICER HERBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff: ANDREW M. KING
Defendant: TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAllister v. Pender County Jail et al
as 5:2022ct03363
Plaintiff: Gordon Tyrone McAllister
Defendant: Pender County Jail, Medical Staff and FNU King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAllister v. Pender County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00201
Plaintiff: Gordon Tyrone McAllister
Defendant: Pender County Jail, Medical Staff and FNU King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. King
as 5:2022hc02164
Petitioner: Tawoine Banks
Respondent: Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nye v. King et al
as 5:2022ct03337
Plaintiff: Jarad Nye
Defendant: FNU King, M.D. FNU LNU, Tracy LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. CHATHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2022cv00723
Plaintiff: ALLEN KING WIGGINS
Defendant: CHATHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?