Cases 21 - 30 of 207
KING v. WARDEN OF CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON
as 3:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
RODERICK ANDREW KING
Respondent:
WARDEN OF CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KING v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv00708
Petitioner:
JEROME KING
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KING v. TESLA et al
as 2:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
OLIVER AARON KING
Respondent:
KIM TESLA, MITCHELL SHAHEN, RICHARD MANCINI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. WARDEN BEAVER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Defendant:
OLIVER AARON KING
Respondent:
WARDEN BEAVER COUNTY PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KING v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING and SHAWN EVERETT KING
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
