Cases 1 - 10 of 65
King, Jr. v. Office of the Commissioner for Marion County et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roger Howard King, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner for Marion County, West Virginia Marion County Probation Office, Day Report and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Roane
as 5:2022cv00301
Petitioner:
Gerald Tyrone King
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cooper et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Roger Cooper and Ronnie J. Cooper
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Timothy King and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Workman v. King
as 2:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Donald Anthony Workman
Respondent:
Warden King
Defendant:
Timothy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. DCR/SCRJ et al
as 2:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee King
Defendant:
DCR/SCRJ and LT. Jaburs Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Skeens v. King
as 1:2020cv00749
Respondent:
Mercer County and Timothy King
Petitioner:
William Parris Skeens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Punzo v. Jividen et al
as 2:2020cv00744
Defendant:
Tim King, Administrator, Betsy Jividen and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Punzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. King
as 5:2020cv00025
Respondent:
Timothy King
Petitioner:
Richard D. West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
West v. King
as 2:2020cv00101
Respondent:
Timothy King
Petitioner:
Richard D. West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
