Cases 51 - 60 of 113
Lucas Legal Staffing LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01292
Plaintiff:
Lucas Legal Staffing LLC and Brian M. Lucas
Defendant:
Holland & Knight LLP, The RNM Agency Inc., Raj Nichi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coast Enterprise's Inc. et al v. Lion Credit & Captial, et al
as 2:2015cv00393
Plaintiff:
Jonathandavid D. Schmier
Defendant:
Lion Credit and Captial, Amaris Capital Ventures, Rob Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Cephas et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cephas , Jamie Albert , Solange Cole and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gibson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 4:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gibson, Sr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, State Trooper Pruitt, StateTrooper Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knight v. Clarke
as 3:2014cv00524
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wenzel v. Knight et al
as 3:2014cv00432
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Wenzel
Defendant:
Glade M. Knight, Michael S. Waters, Robert M. Wily and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight v. Director Of Department Of Corrections
as 1:2014cv00479
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Knight
Respondent:
Director Of Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DCG&T et al v. Knight et al
as 3:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
DCG&T and Jack Battaglia
Defendant:
Glade M. Knight , Michael S. Waters , Robert M. Wily and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JTH Tax Inc. v. Knight
as 2:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax Inc.
Defendant:
Katherine A. Knight
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Knight v. Carter et al
as 3:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Defendant:
Donnie Carter, City of Richmond Police Dept. Detectives, C. T. Woody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
